BlogArt90

The Vanishing 11 Days In September Year 1752


There is a strange incident that occurred in the month of September 1752, in which the world had lost 11 days. in September there was no date of 3-13. so from the 2nd jump straight to the 14th. for those who want to see, just try set your computer calendar. cuman unfortunately, for windows users, can not view the calendar, for which pakek linux, ato which in addition to windows, take a look, set your computer date of September 1752.

Calendar month of september 1752

Mystery of Missing Days
By Bob Brooke
On September 2, 1752, which occurred a strange place that still remains genealogists on their feet. On that day, the British Isles and all the British colonies, including America, lost 11 days - September 3 to 13. People go to sleep and when they awoke the next morning, the date has changed to 14 September. There were riots in rural areas because people think the government tried to cheat them of 11 days of their lives. Although today disappear on British soil in 1752, numbers have gone elsewhere - France in 1582, Austria in 1584, and Norway in 1700.

Britain was among the last countries in the world to accept that they actually use the calendar disabled. The Julian calendar - named after Julius Caesar, who adopted it around 45 BC - declared March 25 the New Year's Day and added that the year will be 365 days and 6 hours long. The Council of Nicaea adopted the official calendar in 325 AD As it becomes possible to measure more accurately the length of the solar year, astronomers discovered that the system exceeds the Julian solar year by 11 minutes, or 24 hours every 131 years, and three days every 400 years. This excess of 10 days between 325 AD and 1582 AD

Pope Gregory XIII ordered a new calendar, called the Gregorian calendar in 1582, when most of the world jump forward by 10 days on October 5, thus restoring the vernal equinox March 21. To prevent recurrence of this error, he ordered that, in every 400 years, an extra day of leap year should be removed three times. To achieve this on a regular basis, he eliminated the last day of February in the year one hundred and first two digits is not divisible by four without a remainder. So, it was eliminated in 1700, 1800, and 1900, but will not be eliminated in 2000.

All Catholic countries, following the Pope's orders, implementing a new system. But England, then in trouble with the Church of Rome, refused to go with the new calendar until the mid-18th century and later the difference had grown to 11 days. All land except England Scotland, which converts the calendar 100 years earlier, now celebrating New Year's Day on January 1. In Russia, the Julian calendar still in use.

Although the official calendar, people in Britain and the colonies began using the Gregorian system at the beginning of the 16th century. Thus, many early colonial records, including a double date, written as "12 Feb 1661 / 1662," shows that, although officially in 1661, some consider it to be 1662.

Genealogists, especially those just starting their search for ancestors, need to check the dates found in the English-speaking countries between 1582 and 1752. Is this the date stamped as OS (Old Style) or NS (New Style)? Is there a date listed as 1750/51? That means it would have probably been between January 1 and March 24, which means that 1750 is an old-style notation and in 1751, a new one. Double these dates only occurred in January, February and March - never in any other month and never after 1752.

In addition, the dates in the 17th century often have the month indicated by numbers and not names. This is because most of the month has been the Roman or "heathen" names and the Puritans and Quakers do not like them. Since March is considered as the first month of the year prior to 1752, the date before which might read like this: "13, 2 mo: 1683." This is a "13 April 1683." Generally, the day it arrived first and second month, but for sure, genealogists make sure to compare dates with others in the same record.

Often, a change in the calendar will explain the birth of two children seem to be too short a period. So, if a researcher finds that Joshua and Rachel Smith had a daughter Mary, born March 22, 1638, and from recording a son, Henry, born February 27, 1639, will be seen that they were born 28 days apart, but actually was born 11 months separately, according to the old and new-style kencan.Sumber http://www.kaskus.us/showthread.php?t=8510295

0 komentar:

Posting Komentar